Tackling limited spatial ability: lowering one barrier into STEM?

Chris Dawson 1 *
More Detail
1 School of Education, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp. 14-31. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9531
OPEN ACCESS   1924 Views   1031 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Accumulated evidence indicates that low spatial ability makes a contribution, separate from levels of general or verbal intelligence, to the unlikelihood of students enrolling in, or succeeding in, STEM subjects. Further, there is a tendency for female students not to perform as well as males on some spatial tests, suggesting that this might be part of the reason for their under-representation in some STEM areas. However, the level of spatial ability has been shown to be related to both genetic and environmental factors, thereby suggesting that it can be improved with appropriate training. Here I look at some of this background and prior research, including training studies, in several STEM subjects. Interestingly, as subject specific expertise develops, drawing on specific knowledge tends to replace the need for spatial thinking, so it is the negotiation of any initial spatial barrier into a subject which is crucial. To effect this, I outline a relatively new spatial categorisation which could be valuable for STEM teachers as a framework to help them guide their students through the early spatial demands of their own teaching subject(s).
Keywords: spatial ability, STEM, course selection, gender differences, spatial training

CITATION

Dawson, C. (2019). Tackling limited spatial ability: lowering one barrier into STEM?. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9531

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, G, M., Wilcox, T,,& Woods, R. (2009), Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(3), 427-433.
  • Alias, M., Black, T. R., &Gray, D. E. (2002). Effect of instructions on spatial visualisation ability in civil engineering students. International Education Journal, 3(1), 1-12.
  • Allen, M. J. (1974). Sex differences in spatial problem-solving styles. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 39, 843-846.
  • Astur, R. S., Tropp, J., Sava, S., Constable, R. T. & Markus, E. J. (2004). Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation. Behavioural Brain Research, 151, 103-115.
  • Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
  • Baenninger, M. & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5), 327-344.Barrett, T. J., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Effects of interface and spatial ability on manipulation of virtual models in a STEM domain. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 220-231.
  • Bodner, G. M., &McMillen, T. L. B. (1986). Cognitive & restructuring as the first step in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 727–738.
  • Burte, H., Gardony, A., Hutton, A., & Taylor, H. (2017). Think3d!: Improving mathematicslearning through embodied spatial training. Cognitive Research: Principles andImplications, 2, 1-18.
  • Cakmak, S., Isiksal, M., &Koc, Y. (2014). Investigating effect of origami-based instruction on elementary students’ spatial skills and perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 59-68.
  • Carter, C. S., LaRussa, M. A., &Bodner, G. M. (1987). A Study of Two Measures of Spatial Ability as Predictors of Success in Different Levels of General Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 645-657.
  • Chadwick, P. (1978). Some aspects of the development of geological thinking. Journal of Geology Teaching, 3, 142–148.
  • Cheng, Y-L., & Mix, K.S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematical ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2-11.
  • Cherney, I. D., & London, K. (2006). Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, and outdoor activities of 5- to 13-year-old children.Sex Roles, 54: 717-726.
  • Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U. & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature,427, 311-312.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1996). Genius: the natural history of creativity. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Feng, J., Spence, I., &Pratt, J.. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition.Psychological Science, 18(10), 850-855.
  • Grimshaw, G.M., Sitarenios, G. & Finegan, J. A. (1995). Mental rotation at 7 years: relations with prenatal testosterone levels and spatial play experience. Brain Cognition, 29(1), 85-100.
  • Guven, B. & Kosa, T. (2008). The effect of dynamic geometry software on student mathematics teachers’ spatial visualisation skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 100-107.
  • Hahn, N., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010). Preschoolers' mental rotation of letters: Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry.Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(4), 261-267.
  • Hambrick, D. Z., Libarkin, J. C., Petcovic, H. L., Baker, K. M., Elkins, J., Callahan, C. N., …..&LaDue, N. D. (2012). A test of the circumvention-of-limits hypothesis in scientific problemsolving: The case of geological bedrock mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 397–403.
  • Harle, M., & Towns, M. (2010). A review of spatial ability literature, its connection to chemistry, and implications for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 351-360.
  • Hegarty, M., Crookes, R. D., Dara-Abrams, D & Shipley, T. F. (2010). Do all science disciplines rely on spatial abilities? Preliminary evidence from self-report questionnaires. In: C. Holscher, T. F. Shipley, M. Olivetti Belardinelli, J. A. Bateman, and N. S. Newcombe. (Eds.) Spatial cognition VII. LNCS, vol.6222, pp. 85-94. Springer: Heidelberg.
  • Hegarty, M. & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684-689.
  • Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., Cohen, C., Montello, D. R., &Lippa, Y. (2007). The role of spatial cognition in medicine: applications for selecting and training professionals. In Applied Spatial Cognition, G. L. Allen, Ed., Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Hoffler, T. N., &Leutner, D. (2011). The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations – Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis.Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 209-216.
  • Jirout, J. J., & Newcombe, N. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing spatial skills. Evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample. Psychological Science, 26(3), 302-310.
  • Jordan, K.,Wüstenberg, T.,Heinze, H.J.,Peters, M., & Jäncke, L.(2002). Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks.Neuropsychologia, 40(13):2397-408..
  • Kali, Y., & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 33, 369-391.
  • Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence 35, 211–223.
  • Keehner, M., Tendick, F., Meng, M. V., Anwar, H. P., Hegarty, M., Stoller, M. L., & Duh, Q. Y. (2004). Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. American Journal of Surgery, 188(1), 71-75.
  • Kozhevnikov, M. & Thornton, R. (2006). Real-time data display, spatial visualization ability, and learning force and motion concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 113-134.
  • Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A. & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31, 549-579.
  • Kurth, F., Spencer, D., Hines, M., &Luders, E. (2018). Sex differences in associations between spatial ability and corpus callosum morphology.Journal of Neuroscience Research, 96 (8), 1380-1387.
  • Lamminmäki, A., Hines, M., Kuiri-Hänninen, T., Kilpeläinen, L, Dunkel, L., &Sankilampi, U. (2012). Testosterone measured in infancy predicts subsequent sex-typed behavior in boys and in girls. Hormones and Behavior, 61(4), 611-616.
  • Lee, E. A-L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442.
  • Leff, D. R., Leong, J., Guang-Zhong, Y., &Darzi, M. D. (2008). Visuo-spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residents. The American Journal of Surgery, 195(1), 138.
  • Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 940-949.
  • Levine, S., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S. & Ratcliff, K. (2016). Sex differences in spatial cognition: advancing the conversation. Cognitive Science, 7, 127-155.
  • Linn, M. C. & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479-1498.
  • Loftus, J. J., Jacobsen, M. ,& Wilson, T. D. (2018).The relationship between spatial ability, cerebral blood flow and learning with dynamic images: A transcranial Doppler ultrasonography study. Medical Teacher, 40 (2), 174-180.
  • Lohman, D. F. (1994). Spatially gifted, verbally inconvenienced. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline& D. L Ambroson (Eds.), Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (2nded., pp. 251-264). Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
  • Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 344-351.
  • Maccoby, E., &Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Pao Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Macnab, W. & Johnstone, A. H. (1990). Spatial skills which contribute to competence in the biological sciences. Journal of Biological Education, 24(1), 37-41.
  • Maeda, Y. & Yoon, S. Y. (2013).A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation Ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25, (1), 69–94.
  • Maloney, E. A.., Waechter, S., Risko, E. F. & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012) Reducing the sex difference in math anxiety: The role of spatial processing ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 380-384.
  • Martin-Gutierrez, J., Saorin, J. L., Contero, M., Alcaniz, M., Perez-Lopez, D. C. & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented reality for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computer & Graphics, 34 (1), 77-91.
  • Miller, D. I. & Halpern, D. F. (2013a). spatial thinking in physics: longitudinal impacts of 3-D spatial training. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141-152.
  • Miller, D.I., & Halpern, D.F. (2013b). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and IndividualDifferences,26, 141-152.
  • Miller, D. I. & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18(1), 37-45.
  • Min, Y., Zhang, G., Long, R., Anderson, T. J., &Ohland, M. W. (2011). Nonparametricsurvival analysis of the loss rate of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 2, 349e373.
  • Mohler, J. L. (2008). A review of spatial ability research. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 72(3), 19-30.
  • Moore, D. S. & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063-1066.
  • Molina-Carmona, R., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., & Mora-Mora, H. (2018). Virtual Reality Learning Activities for Multimedia Students to Enhance Spatial Ability. Sustainability, 10 (4), 1074 – 1087.
  • Myers, C. T. (1958). Some observations of problem solving in spatial relations tests (ETS RB 58-16); Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.
  • Newcombe, N.S.& Shipley, T.F. (2015). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity 179-192. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Newhouse, P., Newhouse, C, &Astur, R. S. (2007). Sex differences in visual-spatial learning using a virtual water maze in pre-pubertal children.Behavioural Brain Research, 183(1), 1-7.
  • Orion, N., Ben-Chaim, D., &Kali, Y. (1997). Relationship between earth science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 129-132.
  • Parsons, T. D., Larson, P., Kratz, K., Thiebaux, M., Bluestain, B., Buckwalter, J. G. & Rizzo, A. (2004). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment. Neuropsychologia, 42 (4), 555–562.
  • Peters, M. (2005). Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems.Brain and Cognition,57 (2), 176–184.
  • Price, J. (2010). The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review, 29, 901e910.
  • Rafi, A., Samsudin, K. A. & Said, C.S. (2008). Training in spatial visualization: The effects of training method and gender. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 127-140.
  • Redick, T. S. &Webster, S. B. (2014). Videogame interventions and spatial ability interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8 (183), 1-5.
  • Rimfeld et al. (2017). Phenotypic and genetic evidence for a unifactorial structure of spatial abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(10), 2777-2782.
  • Rodán,A., Contreras,M. J., Elosúa, M. R.,&Gimeno, P. (2016). Experimental but not sex differences of a mental rotation training program on adolescents. Frontiers of Psychology, 7, 1050, 1-12.
  • Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35, 83-92.
  • Roof, R. L.,& Havens, M. D. (1992). Testosterone improves maze performance and induces development of a male hippocampus in females. Brain Research, 572, 310-313.
  • Schöning, S., Engelien, A., Kugel, H., Schafer, S., Schiffbauer, H., Zwitserlood, P . . . . . & Konrad, C. (2007). Functional anatomy of visuo-spatial working memory during mental rotation is influenced by sex, menstrual cycle, and sex steroid hormones. Neuropsychologia,45(14), 3203-3214.
  • Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497
  • Shea, D L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P.(2001). Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented YoungAdolescents: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 93(3), 604–614.
  • Sorby, S.A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills, The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63 (2), 21–32.
  • Sorby, S. A. (2007) Developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 13:1, 1-11.
  • Sorby, S.A. &Baartmans, B.J. (2000). The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, July, 301-307.
  • Sorby, S. A. (2009a). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459-480.
  • Sorby, S. (2009b). Developing spatial cognitive skills among middle school students. Cognitive Processing, 10(Suppl. 2), 312e315.
  • Sorby, S., Casey, B. M., Veurink, N., &Dulaney, A. (2013).The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences 26:20–29.
  • Spence, I. &Feng, J. (2010). Videogames and spatial cognition. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 92-104.
  • Stieff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 219-234.
  • Stieff, M., Ryu, M., Dixon, B., & Hegarty, M. (2012). The role of spatial ability and strategy preference for spatial problem solving in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 854-859.
  • Stieff, M., Dixon, B. L., Ryu, M., Kumi.,B. C., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Strategy training eliminates sex differences in spatial problem solving in a STEM domain. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 390-402.
  • Sundberg, H., Roscher, B. E., Smievoll, A. I., Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., Lundervold, A., ……& Ersland, L. (2000). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in amental rotation task.Medical Science Monitor,6(6), 1186-1196.
  • Tan, U., Okuyan, M., Bayraktar, T., & Akgun, A. (2003). Covariation of sex differences in mental rotation with body size. Perceptual Motor Skills, 96(1), 137-144.
  • Tan, O., Okuyan, M., Albayrak, T. & Ahmet, A. (2003). Sex differences in verbal and spatial ability reconsidered in relation to body size, lung volume and sex hormones. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 1347-1360.
  • Terlecki, M., Brown, J., Harner-Steciw, L., Irvin-Hannum, J., Marchetto-Ryan, N., Ruhl, L., &Wiggins, J. (2011). Sex Differences and Similarities in Video Game Experience, Preferences, and Self-Efficacy: Implications for the Gaming Industry. Current Psychology, 30 (1), 22–33.
  • Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S. & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 996-1013.
  • Tosto, M. G., Hanscombe, K. B., ……&Kovas, Y. (2014). Why do spatial abiliites predict mathematical performance?.Developmental Science, 17(3), 462-470.
  • Tuckey, H., & Selvaratnam, M. (1993). Studies involving three-dimensional visualisation skills in chemistry: a review. Studies in Science Education, 21, 99-121.
  • Tzuriel, D., &Egozi, G. (2010). Gender differences in spatial ability of young children: The effects of training and processing strategies. Child Development, 81(5), 1417-1430.
  • Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C. & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Training Studies. Psychological Bulletin 139(2), 352–402.
  • Uttal, D. H. & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Chapter 4 - Spatial thinking and STEM education: when, why and how? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 12, 147-181.
  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S. & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270.
  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817-835.
  • Wanzel, K. R., Hamstra, S. J., Anastakis, D. J., Matsumoto, E. D., & Cusimano, M. D. (2002). Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. TheLancet, 359)9302), 230-231.
  • Weiss, E., Siedentopf, C. M., Hofer, A., Deisenhammer, E. A., Hoptman, M. J., C. Kremser, C., . . . . . Delazer, M. (2003). Sex differences in brain activation pattern during a visuospatial cognitive task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy volunteers. Neuroscience Letters, 344(3), 169-172.
  • Woollett, K. &Maguire, E. A. (2001). Acquiring “the Knowledge” of London’s layout drives structural brain changes. Current Biology, 21, 2109-2114.
  • Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S. & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (4), 763-771.