Challenges pre-service teachers face when implementing a 5E inquiry model of instruction

Ramya Enugu 1, Hayat Hokayem 1 *
More Detail
1 Texas Christian University, Forth Worth, Texas, USA
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp. 178-209. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9506
OPEN ACCESS   2415 Views   1225 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study examined the challenges that pre-service teachers faced when implementing inquiry and their perspective on how to overcome them. The data sample was 55 pre-service teachers (PSTs) enrolled into two sections of a science methods course in a private university in North Texas. The data sources consisted of inquiry-based lesson plans, PST interviews, peer teaching observational notes, and field notes to investigate those challenges. The data were coded through designed rubrics for lesson plans and peer teaching sessions and were analyzed using the constant comparative method. The results of this study showed that PSTs faced several challenges regarding the science content and the teaching method. The PST face main challenges with the explain and the elaborate phases of the 5E. They also faced challenges difficulties with managing the time to teach the 5E model, and mapping the lessons to the different parts of the 5E model. The results also showed several solutions such as having solid science content through engaging in different experiences, and having more practice with the 5E lesson planning. We discuss the implications of this study for teacher education programs.
Keywords: 5E teaching model, inquiry, pre-service teacher's (PSTs), teacher education

CITATION

Enugu, R., & Hokayem, H. (2017). Challenges pre-service teachers face when implementing a 5E inquiry model of instruction. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-209. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9506

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., ...Tuan, H. (2002). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.
  • Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241-247.
  • Black, K. (2004). Science in the trenches: An exploration of four pre-service teachers’ first attempts at teaching science in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 25-44.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Creating Teachable Moments. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
  • Bybee, R., Taylor, J., Gardener, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, C. J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCE 5e instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Retrieved from http://bscs.org/sites/default/files/_legacy/BSCS_5E_Instructional_Model-Full_Report.pdf.
  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a pre-service teacher to create an inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 175–194.
  • Davis, E., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teacher’s face. Review of Educational Research. 76(4), 607-651.
  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes, PA: Open University Press.
  • Fantilli, R. D., & McDougall, D. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: Challenges and supports in the first years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 814-825.
  • Fazio, X., Melville, W., & Bartley, A. (2010). The problematic nature of the practicum: A key determinant of pre-service teachers’ emerging inquiry-based science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 665-681.
  • Ferber, T., & Nillas, L. A. (2010). Through the eyes of student teachers: Successes and challenges in field teaching experiences. National Teacher Education Journal, 3(2), 61-85.
  • Gerber, B. L., Cavallo A. M. L., & Marek E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability, International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535-549.
  • Giebelhaus, C. R., & Bowman, C. L. (2002).Teaching mentors: Is it worth the effort? The Journal of Education Research, 95(4), 246-254.
  • Graham, B. (2006). Conditions for successful field experiences: Perceptions of cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1118-1129.
  • Grant, C. A., & Gillette, M. (2006). A candid talk to teacher educators about effectively preparing teachers who can teach everyone’s children. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 292-299.
  • Hanuscin, D., & Lee, M. H. (2008). Using the learning cycle as a model for teaching the learning cycle to preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 51-66.
  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.
  • Kang, E. J. S., Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2013). Crossing the border from science student to science teacher: Preservice teachers’ views and experiences learning to teach inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 427-447.
  • Karplus, R., Thier, H., Lawson, C., Knoll, R., & Montgomery, M. (1967). Science curriculum improvement study. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Lawson, A. E., Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills. National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Cincinnati, OH
  • Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1021-1043.
  • Luera, G. R., Moyer, R. H., & Everett, S. A. (2005). What type and level of science content knowledge of elementary education students affect their ability to construct an inquiry-based science lesson? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 12-25.
  • McDonnough, J. T., & Matkins, J. J. (2010). The role of field experience in elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and ability to connect research to practice. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 13-23.
  • Meador, G. (1988). The Piagetian Intelligence Model and the Learning Cycle. Retrieved from http://www.bhsphysics.org/papers/
  • Sadler, T. D. (2006). “I won’t last three weeks”: Preservice science teachers reflect on their student-teaching experiences. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 217-241.
  • Schulz, R., & Mandzuk, D. (2005). Learning to teach, learning to inquire: A 3-year study of teacher candidates’ experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 315-331.
  • Sickel, A. J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2015). Beliefs, practical knowledge, and context: A longitudinal study of a beginning biology teacher’s 5E unit. School Science and Mathematics, 115(2), 75-87
  • Walbert, D. (n.d.). The learning cycle. Retrieved from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/663
  • Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigations: The impact of pre-service instruction of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783-835.
  • Yoon, H.-G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42, 589-608.
  • Zembal-Saul, C., Starr, M., & Krajcik, J. S. (1997). Preparing elementary science teachers: An application of research and practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Chicago, Illinois.